LIST OF ABUSER COUNCILLORS & MP's

Labour Councillor (Northampton/Northamptonshire), and former School Governor, Alec Dyer-Atkins – Convicted and jailed for 2 years in 2003 for downloading more than 42,000 pictures and films described in court as “Horrifying images of child abuse”. Dyer-Atkins was a member of an international paedophile ring called `The Shadows Brotherhood` which was successfully penetrated following stirling work by Britain’s National Hi-Tech Crime Unit (NHTCU). Commenting on the conviction of the depraved Labour Party beast, NHTCU Deputy Head, Mick Deats said: “This man had some of the worst images on his computers that officers from this unit have ever viewed”.

Tory Party General election candidate, Michael Powell - Convicted and jailed for 3 years for downloading hardcore child porn.

. Tory Party Councillor (Wickbar/Bristol) Roger Talboys - Convicted and jailed for 6 years for multiple sex attacks on children.

. Tory Party Vice-Chairman of Welsh Conservatives, Andrew Baker - Received a banning order for stalking women.

. Tory Party MP (Billericay) Harvey Proctor - Stood trial for sex offences of a sado-masochistic nature against teenage boys, and was forced to resign.

. Tory Party Councillor ( Stratford-upon-Avon ) Christopher Pilkington - Convicted of downloading hardcore child porn on his PC. Placed on sex offenders register and forced to resign.

. Tory Party councillor ( Coventry ), Peter Stidworthy - Charged with indecent assault of a 15-year old boy.

. Tory Party Mayor ( North Tyneside ), Chris Morgan - Forced to resign after being arrested twice in 2 weeks, for indecent assault on a 15-year old girl, and for suspicion of downloading child porn.

. Tory Party MEP, Tom Spencer - Caught smuggling drugs and porn through customs.

. Tory Party councillor and former Mayor (Wrexham), Michael Morris - Convicted and put on probation for 2 years, for the indecent assault of another man, which was captured on CCTV.

. Tory Party Liaison Manager on the London Assembly, Douglas Campbell, who’s job includes running the Tory GLA website - Arrested for allegedly downloading child porn. He is currently suspended while the Police investigation continues.

. Labour Councillor (Newton Aycliffe) Martin Locklyn - Convicted and jailed for 15 years for sexually abusing 3 14-year-old boys.

. Labour Councillor (North Lincolnshire) David Spooner - Convicted and jailed for 1 year for masturbating in front of 2 young boys.

. Labour Mayor (Westhoughton/Lancashire) Nicholas Green - Convicted and jailed for 10 years for 3 rapes and 13 counts of indecent assault against little girls between the age of 6 and 10. He raped one woman on her wedding day.

. Labour Mayor (Todmordon) John Winstanley - Convicted and jailed for rape and threats to kill. After raping and threatening to kill his terrified victim, Winstanley then ordered the woman to go on all fours before urinating on her.

. Prominent Labour Party activist Mark Tann (who has met Tony & Cherie at Party functions) recently got a 15-year sentence for raping a 4-year old girl on 2 separate occasions.

. Labour’s current Parliamentary Candidate (Reading East) Tony Page - Has 2 Convictions for Acts of Gross Indecency` in public toilets.

. Labour Mayor (Burnley) Mark Swainston - Convicted of sex offences in public toilet.

. Entire Labour Party conspired to conceal the activities of Labour Party activist and serial child-molester Mark Trotter, who died from AIDS before he could be convicted.

. Labour Councillor (North Yorkshire) Raymond Coats - Court appearance for indecently assaulting a woman.

. Labour MP (Rhonda Valley) Chris Bryant poses in his pants on the Internet to advertise himself for casual gay sex encounters. Describes himself as “Horny as bu**ery” and says, “I’d love a good long f**k”.

. Labour Councillor (Manchester), George Harding - Charged with indecent assault on a girl of 12.

. Labour MP Ron Davies was mugged by a Rasta on Clapham Common while cruising for gay sex. He was photographed again by the media recently, engaged in some `man-on-man` action in a field off a motorway. “I was only looking for badgers” he said.

. Labour Councillor (Durham), Derrick Payne - Arrested by Police following a sex attack.

. Labour MP, Joe Ashton - Caught up in a Police raid while frequenting a brothel. Tried to lie his way out of the scandal.

. Labour Councillor (Shropshire), Derek Woodvine - Arrested by Police in anti-porn operation.

. Labour Councillor (Basildon), Tony Wright - Forced to resign after being caught using his council computer to download porn.

. Labour MP (Sheffield), Clive Betts - Suspended from Parliament for 7 days after being caught forging immigration papers to extend the stay of his Brazilian rent-boy gay lover.

* Senior clerk Phillip Lyon, who arranges the weekly Prime Minister’s Question Time for Tony Blair, was arrested after vice cops raided his Commons office.Lyon, 37, is accused of making indecent images of children.

* The Labour Party in Calderdale has been plunged into a crisis as their lead candidate, and former Mayor of Hebden Royd, Stewart Brown, has been arrested on suspicion of child porn offences.

Labour Councillor and Deputy Council Leader (Northumberland), John Whiteman, who was also a senior member of the local police authority – Convicted and fined in 2002 for soliciting a prostitute in the red light district of Middlesbrough. The court heard Whitman was arrested in his car as Police discovered him in a “state of undress” with a lady of the night he had just paid £35 for sex. He subsequently resigned from the council.

Labour Councillor (Stoke/Staffordshire), Michael Barnes, put forward a motion in July 2004 to change the constitution of Stoke-on-Trent Council. The proposed amendments were designed to prevent the City’s two British National Party councillors from chairing any committees, so as to `protect` the good citizens of Stoke from the beastly BNP types they’d voted for in huge numbers to represent them. As Mr Barnes explained to the local paper, the move was “to prevent the BNP from exerting more influence”, and was “in the best interests of the people of Stoke-on-Trent”. A few months later, in November 2004, the civic-minded and virtuous Councillor Barnes appeared at North Staffordshire Magistrates Court, to face seven different charges relating to child pornography

Labour Councillor (Durham), Derrick Payne – Arrested by Police following a sex attack

Labour Councillor and former Mayor (Halton/Cheshire), Liam Temple - Convicted in 2004 of `Inciting a child under 16 to commit an act of gross indecency` after the 58-year old Labour pervert had attempted to molest a 12-year old girl. During the case, the brave youngster told the court via a video link: “He said if I let him touch me he would give me money”.

Labour Councillor (Coxhoe/Durham), Les Sheppard – Convicted in 2004 on ten counts of indecent assault on young girls. Jailed for 2 years, and placed on the sex offenders register for 10 years. Teeside Crown Court heard how 71 year old Cllr Sheppard lured his victims into his gold Porsche before driving them to remote spots, where he would submit them to sickening sex attacks. After his arrest, the Labour nonce-case told police “I love women, but you do things which you regret”. Sheppard’s `women` victims were between 9 and 13 years old.

According to media reports, the names of 2 former Labour Cabinet Ministers said to be `Household names` appear on the `Operation Ore` list of subscribers to hard-core child pornography. The same FBI investigation, which led to the arrest of rock star Pete Townshend. So who are they Mr. Blair?

Yusef Azad – One of Ken Livingston’s overpaid left-wing cronies on the London Assembly gravy train – Resigned from his 60K-plus a year job `assisting` Assembly members, after being arrested on suspicion of downloading child porn in 2003.

Labour Councillor (Wokingham/Berkshire), Nelson Bland – Convicted on 16 counts of possession and distribution of hardcore child porn in 2004. Sentenced to community service, placed on the sex offender’s register and ordered to attend rehabilitation classes for paedophiles. Bland used his own teenage daughters computer to hoard his grotesque gallery of child abuse, which was discovered by police during a search of Bland`s home, when they arrested him in connection with the murder of a Nottingham businessman

Labour Councillor and Mayor-Elect (Merton/London), Sam Chaudry – Due to become Merton’s first Asian Mayor, before he was arrested, tried and convicted of multiple sex attacks on young girls in 1999. One of his victims was a 5-year old.

Labour Councillor (Halton/Leeds), Lee Benson – Convicted and awaiting sentence in 2005, after pleading guilty on 12 counts of possession of indecent images of children, featuring youngsters between the ages of 5 and 11. Benson, who has a child of his own, repaid the fools who voted for him by storing his revolting kiddie porn collection on the computer provided for him by the council. Benson has been `suspended` - not expelled - by the Labour Party, which means his name remains on the Labour Party membership list, as well as on the sex offenders register. As to which is the more shameful – take your pick!

Labour Councillor (Bridgend/South Wales), Iestyn Tudor Davies – Convicted, jailed for 7 years, and placed on the sex offender’s register for life in 2005, for repeatedly raping a 9-year old girl

Labour Councillor (Newham/London), Greg Vincent, who was the Election Agent to Labour MP Tony Banks at the 2001 General Election – Convicted and given a 2-year community rehabilitation order in 2003, for possession of hardcore kiddie porn films and photos, featuring children as young as 8. One of the photos the Labour Councillor found so entertaining, featured – as described in court – a girl aged around 10, naked except for a dog-collar, being assaulted and abused while her hands were tied behind her back around a beam. Vincent was also a School Governor

Prominent Edinburgh Labour party activist and election candidate, Rab Knox - Convicted and jailed for 3 years in 2005 for a horrific sex attack on a woman passenger in his taxi cab.

Labour Party Official (North West England Regional Officer, and parliamentary adviser to the Home Office Minister responsible for crime and policing, Hazel Blears), Peter Tuffley – Convicted and jailed for 15 months and placed on the sex offenders register for 10 years in 2006, for the sexual molestation of a 13-year old boy that he had previously `groomed` on the internet. Tuffley was described as a `rising star` within the Labour Party - which is nothing to be proud of either

Labour Councillor (Hornchurch/Essex), Alan Prescott, who was also a senior magistrate – Convicted and jailed for 2 years in 2001, for molesting children at the East London care home where he was the superintendent. Prescott, described in court as a “pillar of his local community” admitted carrying out sex attacks on four teenage boys as they slept in their beds

Labour Parliamentary candidate (Cheadle/Cheshire), Paul Diggert – Subject of a 2002 police investigation into the alleged procurement of underage girls for sexual purposes via internet chatrooms. According to the `Sunday Mirror` (3/11/02), Diggert had admitted to having four underage girls that he was `grooming` for sex. In 2004 Diggert was convicted of making and distributing indecent pictures of children

Labour Councillor (Dagenham/London), Terry Power – Forced to resign in 1999 after being arrested and charged with sex attacks on teenage boys. Details of trial and conviction to follow.

Labour Councillor (Westlands/Worcestershire), Keith Rogers – Convicted, fined, and placed on the sex offender’s register in 2003, after downloading over 2,000 hardcore child porn photos on his computer

Labour councillor Ex-Paston councillor Gilbert Benn (48) A former city councillor was a five-year jail sentence for molesting an 11-year-old boy and threatening the youngster’s mother in a bid to cover his tracks.

Selby Social Services Permit Unsupervised Contact With Dangerous Father

Selby Children & Young Peoples Service, Children’s Social Care are permitting unsupervised contact with a dangerous parent despite years of on-going child protection concerns due to the risks he poses.

The father of the children, who cannot be named to protect the identities of the children, has been permitted to contact the children utilising an social networking site, despite child protection concerns for the children. The family came to the attention of the local authority some years ago due to serious concerns for the safety of both the children and the mother due to domestic violence. A conference with the Local Authority concluded that if the father returned to reside at the family home the children would be placed on the ‘At Risk Register’ and another Child Protection Conference would be convened with a view to placing the children under the care of the local authority. The mother ended all personal association with the father, and secured alternative accommodation for her family to ensure their safety.

The father instigated sporadic and infrequent contact with the children, however this was deemed not in the best interests of the children by a legal advisor after the father failed to return the children at the agreed times, which distressed the children. There were also fears the father had supplied the children cigarettes and alcohol. Following contact from the mothers legal representative the father ceased contact.

However 3 years ago the father had further children from another relationship removed from his care by different authority and those children were subsequently placed with adoptive families due to serious child protection concerns. The father then began harassing the mother of his first family and also one of her children. A complaint was made to the police, and a full investigation was made into the matter. He received a warning from the police and all contact ceased. However he has recently begun contacting the children from his first relationship, whom are in the care of the local authority, by way of utilising a social networking site. This is despite concerns of the mother, whom retains parental repsonsibility of the children concerned.

The mother has contacted the local authority, who refuse to accept the seriousness of the child protection concersn despite a well documented history. The local authority have a legal duty to safeguard all children from the ‘Possibility Of Harm’, under Every Child Matters and the Children Act 1989, yet are mismanaging the matter, which has now been referred directly to the Department For Children, Schools and Families by the mother due the seriousness of her concerns for the children’s safety.

Selby Social Services Ignore & Breach Data Protection Act 1998

In February 2009 a Manager of Selby Social Services, Children Social Care, was served with a letter re Section 10 of the Data Protection Act 1998 requesting the Local Authority cease processing data, which was both distressing and damaging to a particular family. Section 10 of the DPA clearly states:

10 Right to prevent processing likely to cause damage or distress

(1) Subject to subsection (2), an individual is entitled at any time by notice in writing to a data controller to require the data controller at the end of such period as is reasonable in the circumstances to cease, or not to begin, processing, or processing for a specified purpose or in a specified manner, any personal data in respect of which he is the data subject, on the ground that, for specified reasons—


(a) the processing of those data or their processing for that purpose or in that manner is causing or is likely to cause substantial damage or substantial distress to him or to another, and

(b) that damage or distress is or would be unwarranted.

Once such correspondence has been served upon the Local Authority they then have a timeframe of 21 days in which to respond in writing to the request to cease processing data, as stated in Section 10 (3) of the Data Protection Act 1998:

(3) The data controller must within twenty-one days of receiving a notice under subsection (1) (“the data subject notice”) give the individual who gave it a written notice— .

(a) stating that he has complied or intends to comply with the data subject notice, or .

(b) stating his reasons for regarding the data subject notice as to any extent unjustified and the extent (if any) to which he has complied or intends to comply with it.


Refusing to respond to the letter and continuing to process such data even after a reasonable amount of time has passed is breach of the act, however Selby Children's Social Care conveniently state they lost the S.10 letter, despite it being hand delivered to the manager in question, and that person signed a receipt to state they had received the notice. The processing of distressing and damaging data has continued by Selby Children's Social Care to the present time. It is shocking to think a Local Authority continue to process distressing data for 13 months ago after the family have requested they cease doing so due to the adverse affect this causes them.

However S.10 (4) of the Data Protection Act 1998 goes on to state:

4) If a court is satisfied, on the application of any person who has given a notice under subsection (1) which appears to the court to be justified (or to be justified to any extent), that the data controller in question has failed to comply with the notice, the court may order him to take such steps for complying with the notice (or for complying with it to that extent) as the court thinks fit.

It seems legal action can be taken by the Information Commissioners Office against any authority who refuse to adhere to such notices.

It is without doubt that Selby Children's Social Care have breached Section 10 (1), (3) & (4) of the Data Protection Act 1998.

What a shame such steps have to be taken when over-zealous Local Authorities will stop at nothing and ignore Statutory Laws and Acts to enable them to continue to behave illegally, in a bid to gather potentially damaging information which they wish to utilise in a Family Court Care Proceedings with the sole aim of securing a vulnerable child for forced adoption.

Local Authority's clearly have no regard for the Laws & Acts if this country, nor do they have any regard for the damage and distress they cause to families whilst they pursue performance indicators. It is high time this government and the legal system woke up to the fact that lives are needlessly being systematically destroyed.

Costs re Child Contact Cases within the last 5 years

North Yorkshire County Council (Social Services Corrupt kiddy snatchers): Tim Yeo Accuses Council Of Kidnapping A Young Baby

North Yorkshire County Council (Social Services Corrupt kiddy snatchers): Tim Yeo Accuses Council Of Kidnapping A Young Baby

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQxnGxbildM

Tim Yeo Accuses Council Of Kidnapping A Young Baby

Click on the URL link to watch the Youtube Video.

Thank you to Tim Yeo MP for speaking out and exposing such corrupt practices within childrens social care services in the UK.

Andrea Pecherek (Chartered Psychologist, Sheffield))

Andrea Pecherek - Chartered Psychologist, Sheffield.

Quite a nice lady upon first meeting, but there is a drker deeper side to this one. She says in her own words & I quote "My time is expensive". What a remark to make a parent who is being assesed for care proceedings! Well Ms Pecherek your time is being well paid for, at the rate of £100 per hour by the legal services commssion and by North Yorkshire County Council.

Ms Pecherek's only qualifications are an Open University Psychology degree attained in the 1970's (well out of date) and she then practised as a Child Educational Psychologist. She now lists her expertise as writing hundreds of court reports on parents as an Independent Expert Witness. There is nothing in Ms Pechereks CV to suggest she has any clinical qualifications at all, so how can she protray herself and an expert in adult psycholgy? She certainly does not have a Ph.D She is not able to diagnose any adult as diagnoses are given by Psychitarist only, yet Ms Pecherek often writes diagnoses in her reports, soemthing she is not qualified to do.

Ms Pecherek uses Freudian theories when these are now well over 50 years old and have been superceeded by others. Freudian theories are largely based on sexual frustration, so I wonder if Ms Pecherek is trying to tell us something, a Freudian slip on her part maybe?

Ms Pecherek writes reports based on the Local Authorities biased, opinionated files re the parent, which she does not check to ascertain if the details are factually correct. She may make recommendations for reunification for the children to be returned to their parents in court, yet she neglects to ensure these critical recommendations are written into the children's care plans. This then permits the local authority to ignore her recommendations. Having a duty as an Independent Expert Witness, one would expect her to ensure this step is taken and that the Local Authority adhere to the recommendation in the best interests of the child(ren), however this matter is regularly an neglected as an oversight on all parties. This leaves the Local Authority to keep the children in their care long-term, alnguishing in foster care (they utilise the Permanence Plan), severing contact with the parents, when the children actually have a right to contact.

Ms Pechereks CV is listed below (please pay attention to where she lists that she has prepared over 800 reports for the courts & at what expense?):

ANDREA PECHEREK
B.A., B.Sc., M.Sc., AFBPS

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERTISE

Professional Qualification
Chartered Psychologist

Areas of Expertise

• Child Protection
• Assessment of children and families
• Attachment
• Family Dynamics
• Learning Disabilities
• Adoption & Fostering

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

Experience in Specialist Area

I have been working in the field of Child Psychology since 1981 first as a generic educational psychologist later moving to a specialist area of child and family assessments. Prior to this I was a teacher of children with special educational needs.

In addition to my role as offering independent psychological assessment and advice I have worked both within the field of educational psychology and child and adolescent therapy (community health).

I have also acted in the area of Children Act Consultant with particular reference to psychology and Child Protection.

I have been a member of the Sheffield Area Child Protection Committee Training Group and as such shared responsibility for devising, writing and delivering multi-agency training on aspects of Child Abuse including identification, protocols, psychological implications and remediation.

From 1992 to 1997 I was employed as a Child Protection (Children Act) specialist psychologist, and continue to offer lectures, training events and consultation in this field. More recently, I have produced guidelines on issues pertaining to children and domestic violence. I also offer training events to foster carers on issues concerning child development, child sexual behaviour and behaviour management.


From 1999 to 2004 I was a member of the Sheffield adoption panel to which I continue to offer support on a consultative basis.

From 1993 to 1997 I was Honorary Secretary of the British Psychological Society’s Division of Educational and Child Psychology. I also sat on the BPS Professional Affairs Board. I have been the lead author of a recently published document for the BPS on The Psychologist as Expert Witness and am currently on a reconvened working party looking to revise the guidelines under the auspices of the Professional Affairs Board of the British Psychological Society.

In 2006 and 2007 I am presenting training events for the Central Law Training Agency on ‘Psychological Assessments of Children and Families’. This covers the nature of psychological interviewing and testing; assessment of adults with learning difficulties and the implications for the Courts; Attachment – its meaning and relevance in planning for children.


REPORTS

I have prepared in excess of 800 reports on a regular basis for the family courts for the last 12 years.

QUALIFICATIONS, TRAINING & RESEARCH

Qualifications & Training

B.A. (Open University) 1973 Psychology and Education
B.Sc. (Leicester University) 1980 Psychology
M.Sc. (Sheffield University) 1981 Educational Psychology
Cardiff University Bond Solon accredited Expert Witness (2004)

I attend at training events and conference pertaining to my work for the Courts. The most recent training events which I have attended are:

• The Disability Rights Act (February 2003)
• Parents, Children & Psychology, the International Perspective (Paris, January 2004).
• Contact post adoption – issues and research (Nottingham April 2004)
• Hidden Harm Conference – drugs, alcohol and child protection (Sheffield March 2004)
• Sheffield ACPC Annual Conference – Adult mental health and child protection (September 2005)
• Post adoption contact (Nottingham 2005)
• Domestic Violence (Nottingham 2006)
• Child Psychology issues for the twenty first century (Bournemouth 2006)
• Working with families experiencing trauma (London Institute of Therapy 2006)

MEMBERSHIPS & PUBLICATIONS

Professional Memberships

 British Psychological Society Division of Educational and Child Psychology
 Society for Expert Witnesses
 British Association for Adoption and Fostering





Publications & Presentations

‘Counselling: Aspects and Issues’, written jointly with Dr. H. Cowie (1991) recently translated into 3 languages.

Contributions to edited texts and publications the most recent being a chapter on ‘Living in non-nuclear families’ in Psychology in Action (ed. Sigston et al)

Regular book reviews for professional journals.

British Psychological Society guidelines on The Psychologist as Expert Witness 1997 (currently in review)

OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION

 I have full enhanced CRB clearance.
 I hold personal professional indemnity insurance.
 I hold a clean driver’s license.

The Corrupt Tactics Cafcass Utilise

Having had experience of Cafcass one would think that there would be confidence in such a supposed independent public organisation? You are very very wrong. Firstly the prof is in that OFSTED themselves have deemed them to be failing. Hardly surprising Cafcass are seeking to blame excessive case loads. The following are extracts taken from OFSTED damin report of Cafcass, York.

Inspectors evaluated private and public law reports, case files, complaints records,human resources files, duty systems and Cafcass work at court. They surveyed the views of Cafcass staff, adult service users, children and young people. Because the service area did not provide sufficient opportunities to directly observe practice with service users, inspectors saw only a very limited sample of Cafcass practice

Just what where you hiding from OFSTED Inspectors then Cafcass?

The overall effectiveness of the Cafcass North Yorkshire and Humberside service area is inadequate. While to some extent the service area meets the Cafcass statutory functions and resources are deployed effectively to ensure that this is sustained, the leadership team is very new and minimum standards are not met in key areas of service delivery to children and families.

There are weaknesses in many aspects of management and service
provision to children and families. Case planning, assessment, intervention, direct
work, complaints handling, equality and diversity and the overall promotion of
improved outcomes for children and young people are inadequate. While duty
systems have been introduced to manage cases on the waiting list they do not yet
offer a direct service to children and families whose cases have not been allocated.
The area has only recently recognised the complexities and challenges involved in
managing a large group of staff who work from home and are geographically
dispersed.

Prior to the inspection the leadership of the service had not accurately assessed the amount of change required to achieve sustained improvement in service delivery to children and families. The service area has now assessed appropriately that its most significant weaknesses are in the effectiveness of its performance improvement and the accountability of its staff and managers.

Cafcass (York) acknowledge failures re performance, improvement and accountability.

Cafcass do not appraise the situation at dispute correctly and seek instead to simply read social services (bias and factually inaccurate) files. There is a common theme appearing whereby Cafcass reports are simply reworded extracts of social services files and reports of so-called Independent Expert Witnesses.

Engagement with service users is very weak, particularly their influence on improving service design and delivery.

At least OFSTED can acknowledge Cafcass do NOT work with service users.

Cafcass dig themselves an even deeper hole by knowingly providing the family courts with factually inaccurate reports. Some even go as far as to state the children have Attachment Disorders' which have never even been diagnosed by a healthcare professional. Such diagnoses should only ever be made a child psychiatrist whom specialises in the condition. Many of these claims are overly exaggerated by Cafcass to secure the final orders requested by other parties. It is such a shame for the children that their lives are blighted by endless lies, many of which will remain on file and follow them into adulthood.

Cafcass Guardian Ad Litems are NOT qualified to make any such diagnosis as they are nothing more than glorified social workers, as they are registered with the General Social Care Council. This conduct should be regulated by Cafcass management, whom refuse to register parental concerns and complaints. Those who do dare to complain are classed as hostile, aggressive and even vexatious by Cafcass.

While robust human resources action has been taken with those staff who have been assessed as in need of performance improvement, that action is unnecessarily limited to a focus on compliance and it is not yet effective. Capacity to improve is inadequate.

Why do these Cafacss employees retain their positions? Given their responsibility to assess a parents capacity to change if they are struggling to parent, this seems frankly odd that Cafcass officers themselves are deemed incapable of change.


Cafcass rarely provide children with wishes and feelings packs, as they are required to be law. Leaving many courts without an accurate account of the child's true wishes and feelings, for which purpose the booklets are intended. This is in breach of Cafcass National Standards. Is it any wonder this organisation is failing nationally if they are simply not inputting the work required. The child(ren)'s voice is being supressed by a national organisation created by the government to ensure their voices are heard, in addition to the organisation being created by the government to assist the family courts. This is simply NOT happening, the only people Cafcass are assisting is themselves and Social Services (Local Authorities).

Many Cafcass Guardian Ad Litems are self-employed and choose what hours they work, often rudely interrupting families at weekends and in thye evenings, which is unneccessary and inappropriate. Being self-employed they are going to want to support Social Services to needlessly snatch children to secure Best Value Performance Indicators, they would not want their income to dry up would they????

Worse of all Cafcass York, have ben known to instruct solicitors (Mr Philip Andrew Goodall of Harrowells, York) whom has judgements against him name imposed by the Solicitors Regulatory Authority for misuse of clients funds and whose own practice was forcibly closed by the Law Society due to the misuse of funds by the partners. Hardly the type of legal representative whom should be instructed to advocate and act for a national public office?

The above is clear evidence of :
PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE
PERJURY
MALFEASANCE OF OFFICE
MALADMINISTRATION
This is not conduct befitting an officer of a National Government Organisation!

Where is the accountability now as NO action has ever been taken against this corrupt Cafcass officer - Mr Alan Bradley.